In the shadow of a Facebook IPO, a lot has been written
lately about social media policies - How should social media be used by a
company, if at all? What policies need
to be in place? Can we screen candidates
Facebook profile? All of these
questions are interesting and great discussions have been had. But one thing is
missing, once you’re created and disseminated the perfect social media policy
how do you enforce it? Do you really
fire someone for posting on Facebook? In
addition to the obvious questions about whether an employee have a claim for
being fired for a tweet; there are other, more practical issues like how to you
retain and recruit employees if you’re acting like a big brother over their
social media? And how do you encourage
the social media use that’s beneficial to your company while keeping control on
use that can be damaging?
I predict this is one of those generational issues that will
fade over time. In the meantime, it must
be addressed. Employees under 30 grew up
in the social media age, they’ve been labeled by Nielsen as “Generation C” for
“Connected”. They were the early
adopters of Friendster, MySpace, Flickr, Facebook, Foursquare, YouTube,
etc. Many can’t imagine their lives
without tweeting at least daily. Their
main method of communicating with family is over Facebook. Many of them view it the same as talking with
friends on the phone. ? It’s extremely personal to them, yet many
don’t fully comprehend the permanency of those conversations or how they could
be used against them. And now you, evil
lawyer, are telling them they have to watch what they say? And worse, that you’re going to be watching
it?
You’ll definitely lose employee loyalty and potentially also
lose otherwise valuable employees if you’re too draconian about it. It’s a
balancing act for the employer that recognizes that happy, loyal employees
boost productivity and are good for the bottom line. So what’s an in house lawyer to do?
My best advice is to educate and don’t stop educating. Too often we roll out policies without an
explanation of why they are what they are.
Sometimes, we hold back this information for good reason. But with regards to social media, it’s better
to err on the side of over informing your employee bases as to the benefits and
dangers of social media – both for the company and them personally. I use real life examples of past employees
thinking something they posted was “private” because that’s how they have their
settings but the post goes viral because one of their several hundred “friends”
thought it was funny and reposted it in another less private forum. I use examples of Facebook being used by
police, insurance agents, and divorce attorneys, and examples of tweets being
snapped up by the media for better or worse of the companies involved and the
aftermath for their employees. Making it
relatable to the employee is key to getting them to understand that a properly
drafted social media policy leaves room for them to share the pictures of their
kids (or their crazy Friday night party) without violating the policy but
sharing tweets of what they’re working on is a bad idea that will get them
disciplined, if not fired.
For the most part, this has worked for me. There are still outliers who think any censorship;
even self-censorship is bad. When faced
with them, I smile knowing that someday they’re going to regret it – if only
when their grandchildren see grandpa doing handstands on a keg in a skirt (you
know who you are…)
No comments:
Post a Comment